DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**duceswild** · 07-01-2011, 05:12 AM

I meant Mahayana scholarly types Aloka.

Presumably we are excluding those who are "scholarly" enough, and knowledgable enough about "mahayana" teachings to see and cut through the bunkum.

Sri was pointing out direct contradictions in the author's claims with respect to the Buddha's teachings. Not really necessary to call in the E-Stasi hordes to see the confused contradictions for oneself:

The first quote is clear he didn't but the following indicates he did??

07-01-2011, 05:12 AM	#35
duceswild Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 464 Senior Member	I meant Mahayana scholarly types Aloka. Presumably we are excluding those who are "scholarly" enough, and knowledgable enough about "mahayana" teachings to see and cut through the bunkum. Sri was pointing out direct contradictions in the author's claims with respect to the Buddha's teachings. Not really necessary to call in the E-Stasi hordes to see the confused contradictions for oneself: The first quote is clear he didn't but the following indicates he did??
	Quote