View Single Post
Old 06-25-2011, 07:56 AM   #13
Aluback

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
I am not referring to dukkha here. I am referring to the characteristic of things, which includes their impermanence. My view is of course the "inherent" nature of things matters. If they were not inherently that way, there would be no need for the mind to realise their nature to facilitate letting go. My view is if there was no birth-aging-illness-death characteristic, the need for Dhamma would be reduced.

I find "inherently impermanent" quite different from "inherently existent (or non-existent)".
Aluback is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity