Thread
:
Your views on the subject of kamma/karma?
View Single Post
10-30-2010, 06:52 AM
#
27
ssiikmuz
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
370
Senior Member
Curiously, at page 3, Buddhadasa is doing a very detailed explanation about atta and anatta. In zen we are told, for this same purpose, that a rose is not a rose because it is a rose. This last rose is very different as the first one. The first rose is understood by the atta doctrine explained at first by Buddhadasa, then the second rose is the rose of the Nihilists, so then comes the last Rose, the one which the Buddha twirled passing on the silent teaching to the very first Zen ancestor, Mahakashapa.
Quote
ssiikmuz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ssiikmuz
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
07:01 AM
.