View Single Post
Old 12-15-2010, 10:53 PM   #14
HoniSoniproca

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
I agree that Marxism is not about personal liberation so it is meaningless to compare any socio-political view with the Buddha's teachings of not-self. Marxism (or any economic theory for that matter) is about a social order in which people live in harmony under the slogan "from each according to his ability to each according to his needs".

I think the Buddha taught the lay people of his time how to live a good lay life according to the social order that prevailed at that time. He did not try to disturb the socio-economic environment. That was not what he wanted to teach. Thus he taught them compassion, encouraged charity and equality. He also explicitly criticized the cast/creed separation of the ancient society. So it is not completely wrong to say the Buddha's views of a good lay life is somewhat close to socialism. However, the core message the Buddha wanted to pass around was about personal liberation.

Karl Marx on the other hand explained a social order and an economic theory which discourage the private ownership of the means of production. He did not say one should not accumulate wealth or live a good life.
HoniSoniproca is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:14 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity