View Single Post
Old 07-23-2010, 02:36 AM   #5
altosburg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
601
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, there's a lot of superstitious stuff that's gotten mixed in, but it's hard for me to look at a tradition like Tibetan Buddhism (with which I strongly disagree on several points) and say, "Man, I wish you weren't out there, you heretics, you. Why can't you be real Buddhists?"

The urge to declare some people "real" Buddhists and some people less so seems to me far more sectarian than merely having different ways of doing things.
The problem being that there are folks in the tibetan religions pointing at us and saying "those aren't really Buddhists", and "that's just 'dharma lite'." And since especially the tibetan religions are all about blind, unquestioning obedience to, and worship of, one's guru, a lot of people believe that out-of-hand.

That attitude prevailed at the now-thankfully-defunt E-Sangha, and also prevails at E-Sangha West, where we see a moderator (and supposed 40-year practitioner of Buddhism) bristling at the name of Nanavira, and expressing his desire to poke what he calls "Nanavira-wallahs" (and apparently everyone else who sees the Dhamma differently than he does) with pointy sticks.
altosburg is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:32 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity