View Single Post
Old 08-13-2011, 10:11 AM   #36
OvDojQXN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
The Cullavagga doesn't provide any specifics about the Venerable's objections...
Exactly.

The text simply states:
'The Dhamma and the Vinaya, friend Purāna, have been chanted over together by the Thera Bhikkhus. Do thou, then, submit thyself to and learn the text so rehearsed by them.'

'The Dhamma and the Vinaya, Sirs, have been well sung by the Theras. Nevertheless, even in such manner as it has been heard by me, and received by me from the very mouth of the Blessed One, in that manner will I bear it in my memory.' This does not mean the essence of the Dhamma is different.

The Buddha taught in many ways, such as in brief, at length, in verse (poetry), in lists, etc, etc

The essence of Buddha-Dhamma is one and what Purāna would have objected to could not be related to the essence of the Buddha-Dhamma.

Regards
OvDojQXN is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity