View Single Post
Old 07-02-2011, 09:35 AM   #39
UKkoXJvF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
Actually, I'd say this sutta links up quite nicely with the alaya-vijnana model.
It does not because the inclinations in the sutta are not vinanna. They are thought formations or sankhara. When one cannot differentiate vinnana from sankhara (mind consciousness from mind objects) one “can't see the forest for the trees". The sutta states:

Yaññadeva, bhikkhave, bhikkhu bahulamanuvitakketi anuvicāreti, tathā tathā nati hoti cetaso

Whatever a bhikkhu frequently thinks and ponders upon, that will become the inclination of his mind (citta).

Citta (nt.) [Sk. citta, orig. pp. of cinteti, cit, cp. yutta> yuñjati, mutta>muñcati. On etym. from cit. see cinteti].

I. Meaning: the heart (psychologically), i. e. the centre & focus of man's emotional nature as well as that intellectual element which inheres in & accompanies its manifestations; i. e. thought.

Cetaso gen. sg. of ceto, functioning as gen. to citta (see citta & ceto).
UKkoXJvF is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity