[Smabeabumjess]

The term "Hinayana" is used often in Mahayana sutras and is also used by Mahayana authors, such as Red Pine and ZM Seung Sahn, among others.

...another Appeal to Tradition here...?


Of course, it seen as a derogatory term, fairly so. It isn't just seen as a derogatory term, it is a derogatory term. Nowhere is it used that is not sect-bashing and derogatory.

It's probably best to put it in the "sticks and stones" category and let it go. And allow a derisive lie to proliferate further. Doesn't seem like such a great idea. Especially coming from a so-called "mahayanaist" (the other half of the derisive lie). Rather like a Caucasion suggesting that African-Americans simply ignore their use of the word "nigger'.


There is plenty of sect bashing that goes both ways. On this forum, Mahayana Buddhism was described as "speculative". That is not "sect bashing". That is a simple statement of fact, pointed out in reference to specific doctrines or beliefs that are clearly speculative and/or superstitious.

Try to start a conversation about Bodhisatva's among Theravadan practitioners and watch the sect bashing fire up. Again pointing out the differences between what the Buddha taught and what various sects have devolved to is not "sect bashing". "Hinayana" is sect-bashing from start to finish.

It's probably better to focus on the commonalities (which are much greater) than the differences. ...are they much greater, really? I am not convinced. Better to focus on what the Buddha taught (we are supposedly Buddhists, right?), rather than trying to herd the cats of the various sects who ignore his teachings.


But, I will admit that is not as fun.

Round and round... How "fun" is it, really? Looks more like dukkha to me...