[cabonuserollyo]

Sounds like one would have to read his work to see what he really thinks. I googled his name and can see part of the problem is how the Internet newspapers presented his findings. Also, in ancient history classes, I learned that crucifixion was invented by the Phoenicians and picked up by the Romans. Would this scholar argue that many others were not crucified, but only placed on torturing devices? Would he argue that the thieves on each side of Jesus were not crucified, but only placed on torturing devices? Hard to make sense out of this.