I'm very interested to know what constitutes scholarship nowadays. Of course most theological schools whether orthodox or not are quite lacking. Now myself, as a short order cook, I will like to share some real scholarship with this scholar. First off how is it that the gospel story of doubting Thomas is ovberlooked? Thomas specifically mentions nails in the plural as the instruments which affixed his hands to the cross. Obviously the story dates to the first century, isnt that ancient enough. Secondly how is it that this scholar claims that the gospel only mentions that Christ carried a stauron, when scholars already know that when prisoners carried a stauro they actually were carrying the crossbeam! To carry the actual upright pole would mean Christ (and later the man from Cyrene) actually carried a 12-15 foot long pole that weighed hundreds of pounds. Unless Christ was on steroids rather than a bloody mess perhaps he would have been able to pull it off. Even a person who lays down the wooden beams for train tracks can conclude that this scholar is way offbase. This scholar who "reads alot", should instead put down his books and go to the patriarchal museum in Jerusalem where on display is an unearthed 1st century nail going thru a wristbone, belonging to an unlucky victim of crucifixion.