I see two primary differences in the situations. Effie said it was hard to see how anyone could defend the Israelis. The answer is really quite simple - the "reality" that defenders of the Israelis see through their news sources bears almost no resemblance to the "reality" that defenders of the Palestinians see through their news sources. Indeed, from the "reality" they are presented with, defenders of the Israelis have a hard time seeing how anyone can defend the Palestinians. The first reality sees a protective fence to guard against terrorist attacks; the second sees an "apartheid wall". The first sees tremendous Israeli restraint in the face of unthinkable hatred and intense provocations; the second sees callous Israeli aggression against an oppressed and impoverished people. And most who buy into one "reality" can't understand how those buying into the other can be so blind. There is an old saying that "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." When it comes to the Israelis and the Palestinians, however, everyone has their own facts. And figuring out which ones are really facts is a very difficult exercise. In Christ, Mike