[obegeLype]

I have herd that the king of thailand is the most popular monarch in the world, he has been king for a long time and in away he is similar to the british monichy in that his power is very limited and all the realy tought and contraversal decitions are made by the elected democratic government of the day. Because he does not have to make any cotraversial decitions his public relations team can always make him out to be the good guy, but unlike the british monachy who has lost much of it's respect from the public in australia and britian because of there contraversial public lives.
The British Monachy has also lost respect because the poor people of britian have come to realize they are not getting very good value for money. The poor people don't think they should have to work so hard and use there taxes to support some one who is already wealthy and who's original wealth was aquired from stealing land off the pessant farmers. To me paying some one millions of ponds per year to live a luxury life is exsploting the poor people who pay tax to support there exstrasvigant life style.
Persionaly I like the king of thailand as he seems a very decent and respectable man and I hope he is king for a long time, but I not like seeing a million pesants in thailand begging for a living when there are some royals like the king that would be better if they were payed a nominal wage of say $US40,000 for doing this job and giving the rest to the money to the poor, and if they do not want to except the conditions of the job I would gladly do there job for this kind of money.