DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - 1st world Finland citizen 1MB broadband legal rights, 100MB by 2015

**SaLifHoq** · 07-04-2010, 05:40 PM

Who was talking about banning . Certainly not he Finns. Who is talking about depriving the Finns access. Certainly not the Finns. Don't be overly dramatic. As I said before, it legislated minimum speed. A higher quality of service. If you are suggesting that the Finns did that as began to sense danger, that society was going to be deprived of access or that a ban was imminent, you are off the mark.

You are beginning to sound like the old man who constantly claims that he does this and that for the sake of the country and to save the country. Which is all rubbish. If he did not live, our growth might not have been spectacular, but it would not have been oppressive. As know he like you like to draw dramatic conclusions of imminent danger to frighten society.

It is not that anyone had been ban, it is that law now stated that this can not be banned. It is a BASIC RIGHT and MUST NOT BE DEPRIVED.

The BIG DIFF between this and other normal infrastructure upgrade (like you were referring) is that IT ISN’T OPTIONAL, but COMPULSORY and one will be in violation of law to deprive any others to have this access. "

07-04-2010, 05:40 PM	#13
SaLifHoq Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 492 Senior Member	Who was talking about banning . Certainly not he Finns. Who is talking about depriving the Finns access. Certainly not the Finns. Don't be overly dramatic. As I said before, it legislated minimum speed. A higher quality of service. If you are suggesting that the Finns did that as began to sense danger, that society was going to be deprived of access or that a ban was imminent, you are off the mark. You are beginning to sound like the old man who constantly claims that he does this and that for the sake of the country and to save the country. Which is all rubbish. If he did not live, our growth might not have been spectacular, but it would not have been oppressive. As know he like you like to draw dramatic conclusions of imminent danger to frighten society. It is not that anyone had been ban, it is that law now stated that this can not be banned. It is a BASIC RIGHT and MUST NOT BE DEPRIVED. The BIG DIFF between this and other normal infrastructure upgrade (like you were referring) is that IT ISN’T OPTIONAL, but COMPULSORY and one will be in violation of law to deprive any others to have this access. "
	Quote