DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**errolurberozy** · 11-06-2010, 08:57 PM

Seconded, to what everyone else said. She might not have made a decision that parents not named Dina Lohan would approve of by drinking and going off with some stranger in another country, but she didn't do anything wrong.

The only one who did something wrong is van der Sloot. Victim blaming only minimizes what he did by shifting the blame a little to the innocent victim. When something like a murder or a rape occurs the only one who did something wrong was the murderer or the rapist! And clearly he seems to have some other issues with violence, so if not Natalie Holloway, it would have been another girl, drunk or not.

11-06-2010, 08:57 PM	#37
errolurberozy Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 538 Senior Member	Seconded, to what everyone else said. She might not have made a decision that parents not named Dina Lohan would approve of by drinking and going off with some stranger in another country, but she didn't do anything wrong. The only one who did something wrong is van der Sloot. Victim blaming only minimizes what he did by shifting the blame a little to the innocent victim. When something like a murder or a rape occurs the only one who did something wrong was the murderer or the rapist! And clearly he seems to have some other issues with violence, so if not Natalie Holloway, it would have been another girl, drunk or not.
	Quote