Both you and Mr. BS are looking at this too simply. First, I am not against using the drones. So far I do not think the moral issue is a problem. The issue I raise is NOT a fair fight issue, but a moral one of a combantant that can wage war without facing the same consequences as the enemy they are attacking. So long as the drones are used selectively I do not see the moral problem. However, does the using the drones mean that Nevada faces a greater chance of being attacked? If so will the drones lead to victory or an extension of the war?