DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Hacked Emails Suggest Man-made Global Warming Fraud

**BEyng6hj** · 11-24-2009, 10:40 PM

Anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together would realize that what I'm asking for is an analysis of WHAT was changed and how so. What data points and numbers were changed? Silver just claims the presentation was being sexed up, without mentioning WHAT was altered and in exactly what manner. Was any underlying data changed? And, even if no, even sexing up a graph is a big-f--king-deal, since that's the kind of junk the media and bureaucrats love to look at anyway.

I suspect he is hoping the rest of us will stop asking questions and 'just take his word for it.' He's gonna need a lot more than eight short paragraphs to explain why if he wants that to happen.

Here's the actual email that is, apparently, proof of the "warmist conspiracy;"

Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later
today or first thing tomorrow. I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature
trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20
years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd [sic] from1961 for Keith’s to
hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine
values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N.
The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for
1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.

11-24-2009, 10:40 PM	#22
BEyng6hj Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 495 Senior Member	Anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together would realize that what I'm asking for is an analysis of WHAT was changed and how so. What data points and numbers were changed? Silver just claims the presentation was being sexed up, without mentioning WHAT was altered and in exactly what manner. Was any underlying data changed? And, even if no, even sexing up a graph is a big-f--king-deal, since that's the kind of junk the media and bureaucrats love to look at anyway. I suspect he is hoping the rest of us will stop asking questions and 'just take his word for it.' He's gonna need a lot more than eight short paragraphs to explain why if he wants that to happen. Here's the actual email that is, apparently, proof of the "warmist conspiracy;" Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow. I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd [sic] from1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
	Quote