DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**SAUNDERSAN** · 06-13-2012, 06:28 PM

Yes, but you can't have it both ways. You can't support not educating illegals in the DR, and then demand to have Dominican illegals elsewhere be educated on someone elses dime.

I read you live in TX so you probably don't come across many Dominicans in the US... So, I will let you in on a little secret. very very very small percentage of Dominicans are illegal in the US and an even smaller percentage of children are. I know of only 1 child out of the probably thousands of people I know that are here illegally because they overstayed their visa... If and when his mom decides to get her papers she can ask for his green card too.

Counties in TX are already discouraging students who are illegal or their parents are illegals from enrolling and this is after they've already tried see the 1982 supreme court case Plyer v. DOE.

I don't agree with a law that prohibits education. But I am interested to know what is the plan what is its purpose.

Then again part of the argument some people make is.... "oh why educate these kids and let them go to school only to prevent them from going to the University" So, TOMA! se quedan sin NA'

06-13-2012, 06:28 PM	#5
SAUNDERSAN Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 371 Senior Member	Yes, but you can't have it both ways. You can't support not educating illegals in the DR, and then demand to have Dominican illegals elsewhere be educated on someone elses dime. I read you live in TX so you probably don't come across many Dominicans in the US... So, I will let you in on a little secret. very very very small percentage of Dominicans are illegal in the US and an even smaller percentage of children are. I know of only 1 child out of the probably thousands of people I know that are here illegally because they overstayed their visa... If and when his mom decides to get her papers she can ask for his green card too. Counties in TX are already discouraging students who are illegal or their parents are illegals from enrolling and this is after they've already tried see the 1982 supreme court case Plyer v. DOE. I don't agree with a law that prohibits education. But I am interested to know what is the plan what is its purpose. Then again part of the argument some people make is.... "oh why educate these kids and let them go to school only to prevent them from going to the University" So, TOMA! se quedan sin NA'
	Quote