DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Drugsonl** · 11-29-2010, 02:52 AM

false you did not watch my film because we mentioned how the spanish and french bought african slaves and flooded the Island with them several times threw out the video with historic illustrations, it seems you did not pay attention my all knowing wise elder.

why are you angry my all knowing wise elder of mine. i was simply interested in your afrocentric book and that was on topic. yes i live in Haiti and like Africans from the USA, Haiti or any other place in the world who call themselves african before any other creed i consider myself a Caucasian with my blood lines from the southern latin romans and Germanic people before i consider myself anything, and it is not a crime to be proud of who you are and where your ancestors are from.
please carry on i do not want to hinder your voudou discussion, or take you off track, and there is no point in a debate you admitted to everything i wanted to prove and i think you will have less to feel frustrated over when you actually sit and watch the film in its whole and see that your attacks against it are unfounded

interesting, entire posts of mine which veered off the direct subject of threads mysteriously "vanished"..but this repeated violation by you of the accepted rules about relevance is allowed. wow?

Did you really put the doc. out or are you an associate of the person who did. My INITIAL comments in the "white" Haitian thread mentioned that I had seen the FIRST part of the doc. and I questioned why the OPENING, from a linear sense mentioned Dessalines killing and sparing some whites BEFORE it even mentioned what the nature of the relationship between the whites and Africans were on Haiti. The letter A comes BEFORE the letter G.

Had you not been so personally offended, you could have just told me that....ok, fair cirticism, but the history of slavery and the french/spanish role is mentioned LATER on in the doc. But you didn't.....in fact after numerous replies, this is your first time mentioning it.

You could have answered my QUESTION..and diffused the situation in one fell swoop. Go back and re read my comments and tell me that this isn't the case.

Any comments about the THREAD topic?

11-29-2010, 02:52 AM	#30
Drugsonl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 531 Senior Member	false you did not watch my film because we mentioned how the spanish and french bought african slaves and flooded the Island with them several times threw out the video with historic illustrations, it seems you did not pay attention my all knowing wise elder. why are you angry my all knowing wise elder of mine. i was simply interested in your afrocentric book and that was on topic. yes i live in Haiti and like Africans from the USA, Haiti or any other place in the world who call themselves african before any other creed i consider myself a Caucasian with my blood lines from the southern latin romans and Germanic people before i consider myself anything, and it is not a crime to be proud of who you are and where your ancestors are from. please carry on i do not want to hinder your voudou discussion, or take you off track, and there is no point in a debate you admitted to everything i wanted to prove and i think you will have less to feel frustrated over when you actually sit and watch the film in its whole and see that your attacks against it are unfounded interesting, entire posts of mine which veered off the direct subject of threads mysteriously "vanished"..but this repeated violation by you of the accepted rules about relevance is allowed. wow? Did you really put the doc. out or are you an associate of the person who did. My INITIAL comments in the "white" Haitian thread mentioned that I had seen the FIRST part of the doc. and I questioned why the OPENING, from a linear sense mentioned Dessalines killing and sparing some whites BEFORE it even mentioned what the nature of the relationship between the whites and Africans were on Haiti. The letter A comes BEFORE the letter G. Had you not been so personally offended, you could have just told me that....ok, fair cirticism, but the history of slavery and the french/spanish role is mentioned LATER on in the doc. But you didn't.....in fact after numerous replies, this is your first time mentioning it. You could have answered my QUESTION..and diffused the situation in one fell swoop. Go back and re read my comments and tell me that this isn't the case. Any comments about the THREAD topic?
	Quote