View Single Post
Old 12-28-2009, 10:52 PM   #11
Crilosajsamq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
UY,

I hate to be the one spoiling your fun but caocao like most other characters from that era was neither the 100% bad nor 100% good guy.

The narrative Romance of 3 Kingdoms, which some say is 30% fiction or 70% fiction depending, paints Caocao as the villian with ultra paranoid tendencies and self ingratiation almost to the point of mental instability. One must however remember it is a narrative. Real history is probably very different.

In fact, literary scholars don't even interpret Luo Guan Zhong's work as painting caocao as the uber villian. There is a general agreement in these circles that caocao was actually given the most human face in the entire narrative, with an entire personality spectrum ranging from the very humane/righteous/noble to the very cowardly.

The primary character of the narrative, Zhuge Liang, was portrayed as having superhuman intellect who failed in his quest because of blind loyalty and lack of flexibility in his thinking towards the end. A very monotone character development compared to caocao actually.
There is nothing so pure until 100% in historic characters.

曹操老贼 is 曹操老贼 however.


The historic character of bastard Cao Cao is something that we will use to teach future people - our grand children to differentiate between GOOD RIGHTEOUS POLITICIANS and BASTARD POLITICIANS.


The status of Cao Cao is a NEGATIVE ROLE MODEL. That is his value in history. He is a poet, writer, Prime Minister, ruler, warrior, cunning ruthless, selfish bastard.

Crilosajsamq is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity