[AntonayPina]

@kreecher

now back to the point. i don't completely agree with you, that that part of the ra channeling is to be interpreted as such, that things like rape and others (wich we perceive as being negative) are "not allowed". by saying "free will does not allow, ...." you don't say the same thing as "it's not allowed". in the first frase there is a verb, doing, which is related with the free will, in the second frase free will is not even mentioned. i believe ra ment to say that free will doesn't give you the right to damage others. the fact there are negative things is part of the learning proces in which the "how should i deal with free will" is an important issue. in that process there has to be some sort of manouvering space so that you can make mistakes to learn from. so this system doesnt gives you the right to do wrong, it gives you the right to make mistakes to learn from.(which is not the same in my opinion)

it says that an "infringement upon free will" is "greatly undesired". it does not say "it is not allowed". that is correct.

@mmariebored

in the loo perspective, meaning in the mentality that everyone here is another version of you("one"), saying that we need these experiences is like saying, "hmm, i think i'll beat myself up today." from a personal view i agree with you. to me ist seems also very absurd to damage your other me's. but to make that conclusion you had to make some mistakes, you had to gether experiences and knowledge, of both sides to finnaly make this conclusion. so others are still walking on the path, they need experiences and knowledge to make their conclusions. i believe you have to respect the fact that the other me's are all going there path in their tempo, and they need the manouvering space to make mistakes to learn from.

blessings, ld.