DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**DebtDetox** · 04-26-2009, 09:53 PM

i still do not condone these actions of negatively oriented seekers, but they exist, they are here, all i can do is accept them and try to learn certain things from them: as in "not wanting to go down the same road", not judging, really accepting the other as a part of me even if this part hurts ouselves, etc

there are grey areas when it comes to "accepting" actions, especially if it's an action known to become worse and worse if it isn't prevented.

for example, the actions of an arsonist. if no one "judged" his actions and "allowed" him to continue, until he set the whole earth ablaze, all of our free will will become imposed upon, because we decided to just "accept" his actions. we don't have to judge the man himself in order to prevent our own demise. to call him a "negatively oriented seeker" is more of a judgement than preventing his negative actions.

@mmariebored
from a personal view i agree with you. to me ist seems also very absurd to damage your other me's. but to make that conclusion you had to make some mistakes, you had to gether experiences and knowledge, of both sides to finnaly make this conclusion. so others are still walking on the path, they need experiences and knowledge to make their conclusions. i believe you have to respect the fact that the other me's are all going there path in their tempo, and they need the manouvering space to make mistakes to learn from.

i agree with you.

04-26-2009, 09:53 PM	#35
DebtDetox Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 537 Senior Member	i still do not condone these actions of negatively oriented seekers, but they exist, they are here, all i can do is accept them and try to learn certain things from them: as in "not wanting to go down the same road", not judging, really accepting the other as a part of me even if this part hurts ouselves, etc there are grey areas when it comes to "accepting" actions, especially if it's an action known to become worse and worse if it isn't prevented. for example, the actions of an arsonist. if no one "judged" his actions and "allowed" him to continue, until he set the whole earth ablaze, all of our free will will become imposed upon, because we decided to just "accept" his actions. we don't have to judge the man himself in order to prevent our own demise. to call him a "negatively oriented seeker" is more of a judgement than preventing his negative actions. @mmariebored from a personal view i agree with you. to me ist seems also very absurd to damage your other me's. but to make that conclusion you had to make some mistakes, you had to gether experiences and knowledge, of both sides to finnaly make this conclusion. so others are still walking on the path, they need experiences and knowledge to make their conclusions. i believe you have to respect the fact that the other me's are all going there path in their tempo, and they need the manouvering space to make mistakes to learn from. i agree with you.
	Quote