[TagBahthuff]

[ ... ] that is correct. [ ... ]

@lorddragon: well then, i must say that i fully agree with ra when he stated "ra: i am ra. we wish no quibbling but prefer to avoid the use of terms such as the verb, to allow." because of the use of the word "allow", i misinterpreted what you apparantly meant and have clarified in the next post. even though i obviously did interpret what ra said the same way you did (see quote above and previous posts).

we don't have to judge the man himself in order to prevent our own demise. to call him a "negatively oriented seeker" is more of a judgement than preventing his negative actions.

@mmariebored: maybe it's a character flaw that i chose not to do so, but apparantly for clarity i should have repeated myself ->

side-note: i apologize for the duality and group making (negatives, positives, inbetweensies) in my post, but it was the only way (for me anyway) to try and write something that made sense after i was done writing it. in the light of "the law of one", i realize that making such distinctions as neg, pos, etc isn't completely accurate