[arrismVam]

okay, foundation up front:
1. don't know the show, didn't listen then or since.
2. non-us citizen (?alien?) so not so hung up on edgar cayce. (in fact, he never crossed my radar till i came across asc2k/divine cosmos.)

that said, i'm just going on the preceding posts, and past experience - i've tremendous respect for david's research and analysis, both the scientific stuff and loo (which come back to the same thing) and have been a regular reader/contributor to this forum for several years.

when i saw the trail that david was appearing on a show called "beyond reality", on the "sci fi" channel, to be interviewed by the 'ghost hunters' - frankly bells started ringing. it was a moment when you understand what q'uo means when they say, "if this does not resonate with you....."

i appreciate the predicament david found himself in as he explained, and accept that matters were outwith his control. however, the whole premise seemed a bit wacky to me. yeah, exposure is great, and 'all publicity is good publicity' and all that, but what were we hoping to achieve here?

were we trying to prove re-incarnation? on a show where, "... the paranormal has a sense of humor." ?! i ask you! as time_spiral said, "it's just two guys and a bunch of callers saying "prove it" and then denying the proof because they don't believe it. " a real recipe for showcasing the unwary just to gain some cheap personal kudos by doing exactly what 'they' - the plumbers and/or the ratings-greedy-producers - did do: cut you off and let the masses have their ten seconds of fame. "look mam, i'm on the telly!" - or radio in this case.

did we wish to establish acceptance of a relationship to ec? does it really matter? it maybe a bit heretical to pose such a question on this forum, but my point is that david's abilities, talents, contribution as evidenced by his books, recordings, readings, analysis, (serious) broadcasts stand on their own two feet. yes the connection with ec is interesting, and supportive of some sort of pedigree, but edgar was edgar: in 3d terms, that incarnation is past. david is david, here, now, in this lifetime.

would david's massive contribution to all our lives be any less if no-one had noticed any physical or astrological connection with ec?

we know that david recognises a karmic expiation in his current work and i'm sure the majority of this forum appreciate the opportunity to witness and benefit from the example, but we are into deep understandings when we get to this stage, and unfortunately most being humans tend to ridicule what they do not comprehend, especially when it mysteriously seems to tickle some deeply buried, primaeval nerve.

this post is to the forum audience, david, not talking as if you weren't there. it appears not many were impressed by the show, and i'm sure i'd feel pretty bruised were i in your moccasins. onwards and upwards, my son! there are no mistakes only experience.

me, i will be eternally grateful for your unification of science and spirituality, your insights, your industry, your generosity, your integrity, and much, much more; but perhaps most of all for being here in this lifetime where i can learn and grow from your gifts.

love.
neil