[tramadolwithall]

hi liliane and millisamouse,

here are a few pertinent comments from ra on parallel timelines.

law of one, book ii session 36

questioner: do i understand from this then that the higher self or oversoul may break down into numerous units if the experience is required to what we would call simultaneously experience different types of catalysts and then oversee these experiences?

ra: i am ra. this is a statement we cannot say to be correct or incorrect due to the confusions of what you call time. true simultaneity is available only when all things are seen to be occurring at once. this overshadows the concept of which you speak. the concept of various parts of the being living experiences of varying natures simultaneously is not precisely accurate due to your understanding that this would indicate that this was occurring with true simultaneity. this is not the case.

the case is from universe to universe and parallel existences can then be programmed by the higher self, given the information available from the mind/body/spirit complex totality regarding the probability/possibility vortices at any crux. so clearly, one can exist in multiple timelines. is it possible that mellisamouse is remembering things from another timeline? earlier in book i we learn:

law of one, book i, session 11
questioner: you said yesterday that maldek was destroyed due to warfare. if maldek hadn’t destroyed itself due to warfare would it have become a planet that evolved in self-service and would the entities involved have increased in density, and gone on to say the fourth density in the negative sense or the sense of self-service?

ra: i am ra. the planetary social memory complex, maldek, had in common with your own sphere the situation of a mixture of energy direction. thus it, though unknown, would most probably have been a mixed harvest—a few moving to fourth density, a few moving towards fourth density in service to self, the great majority repeating third density. this is approximate due to the fact that parallel possibility/probability vortices cease when action occurs and new probability/possibility vortices are begun. what i find interesting here is the comment that posibility/probability vortices cease when action occurs. so is it possible that some action occurred in the other timeline that caused it to cease (at least with respect to mellisamouse's pertinence there)? if so, then are her memories of the alternate timeline pertinent somehow to this one? i suspect that this is the case.

mellisamouse, do you see any disconnects in terms of current events, either locally or globally? are major world leaders the same and the actions they have taken? it may be worthwhile to take some time and note, on a broader scale than you have thus far, what other differences you see. given that you do see such stark differences, then one must assume that you are supposed to notice these differences in order that they either change to the alternate timeline, or remain independent of it. if this is the case, i rather suspect that the point isn't road construction or queen songs.

love and light,

3d sunset