[giturbewan]

hi all,

as pasted a little up on the page, i emailed project camelot not long ago regarding george green (and dan burish) and this morning i received a response from bill ryan (and kerry cassidy) that i thought i would post here (at bill's permission) for those who might be curious to see what project camelot might have to say.

i didn't expect a response so quickly, so i am grateful that bill and kerry felt my email was as important to them to respond to as it was to me to write it.

here it is:

-----original message-----
from: bill ryan and kerry cassidy
sent: tuesday, 29 april 2008 12:51 am
subject: re: total confusion on where burisch stands - does he even know?
importance: high

hi, tamara -

thanks for your message, and it’s a pleasure to hear from you. you raise a lot of points! in response, as best i (bill) can...

we love dan dearly, and respect him fully, but do disagree with him about his stance on hillary clinton. we talked with him about this personally over a long and interesting dinner in las vegas on 1 april.

running the risk of misrepresenting him, my best understanding of his position is that he’s a traditional patriot who believes that a strong military us with a strong foreign policy is the way to go. he believes, i think, that hillary is likely to be ‘strong’ in that sense. our view, in contrast, is that she’s a pawn of the illuminati and is more likely than obama to be compliant in plunging the world into an even more precarious position than it is already.

we did not let our (genuinely amiable and pleasant) exchange of opinions to interfere with our dinner... or any other aspect of our friendship. dan is a good man, doing the best he can under enormous pressures, and is as entitled as any of us to hold his personal views.

there’s also another reason why he admires hillary, which is confidential (concerning her and her attitude to certain events) and which dan has asked us not to share. we are also fully aware of this. please forgive any understandable frustration you may feel by our not being able to share this bit of personal backstory.

some of george green’s views and positions are controversial (there’s a euphemism for you!), but we felt what he presents is so important that it (like dan’s technical testimony on stargate technology and visiting future humans) is in our view too important to ignore or dismiss with a convenient wave of the hand.

for me personally, the one single most important part of the video was about a minute or so in from the very start when we presented the outtake in the car (actually, on our way to a meal after the interview) in which george mentions his conversation with the governor of colorado who “had his ticket” to australia (presumably, pine gap).

that stunned us, and precipitated a long continuing conversation in the restaurant about illuminati plans for population reduction (c.f. alex jones’ endgame) that unfortunately was just too noisy to record.

george himself is no longer stunned (in the same way!) with his own information, because he’s been living with it for a long time. he’s been presenting much the same message for several years now. so he has learned to smile... he’s an incredibly amiable and pleasant person, on and off camera... the very nicest, most courteous, generous, laid back man.

at the moment, he has a very strong sense of purpose which is heightening every week. he’s traveling around the country talking to all the people who will listen. kerry met with him again in la a couple of days ago where he was addressing a private group.

he’s not making this stuff up. these events may not transpire... but they sure will if we all sit back on our heels and continue to watch tv. he’s doing something about it in the only way he knows, and so he communicates a warning.

if he is to believed, he’s only the messenger anyway - the pleiadians (or whoever his sources may be!) are using him to convey vital information which feels pretty important and resonates with us. we are part of the ‘ground crew’ that george describes, and so may you be and anyone else you feel intuitively you should forward this message to (which is fine to do).

the least we can all do is listen carefully. on our part, we’re taking it seriously... read our recent http://projectcamelot.org/t1v83.html page (‘timeline 1, variant 83’), in which nuclear exchanges are also mentioned (as ‘seen’ in the 2007 time portal intelligence probe), and marry this information together. that’s why we stand by our interview.

with our very best wishes,

bill and kerry

------- end email --------

well, that's interesting (about dan burish) and almost worthy of starting a new thread! but i won't, unless other people also have something to say about it.

cheers,

tamarie