[attanilifardy]

yes, yes, yes to what everybody said, except nelson, sorry mate, rookies are a bit sensitive and who are the rookies anyway? to this forum? well, then i qualify. i sensed some anger there, which is fine and understandable. i personally see nothing wrong with la la land, it's our choice , too bad i can't live there more often.

as usual, i liked bob's take on the discussion, it does seem a bit of a lynch mob towards poor old george who is only doing his best after all. can any of us really judge? and thanks for the link to project camelot, that was really helpful, and very intriguing about hillary, what was that secret positive characteristic she has?

what if, just what if, everybody's wrong about her and she is pretending to go along with the elite so she can get into power, then when she has it, she will turn the tables? you never know, a smart person would do that, wouldn't they? after all, thatcher was removed by the elite when she started to rebel against them. you just never know......

and anyway, what difference does it make? it's understood the candidates are chosen and it's six of one, half a dozen of the other. and also, i never did understand people sitting around discussing politics because it doesn't change anything, it's just a bunch of hot air going nowhere.

of course, here i am doing just that. oh well. also, i keep reminding myself that whatever anyone says about someone is a reflection of what they themselves are, you only talk about what's inside of you, the other person is just a means of projection.

i suppose i could go on, but that's enough. much love to all (for now) larissa