DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**werkeeque** · 02-10-2008, 05:53 AM

i've been spending some time listening to the project camelot interviews with dan burisch, and i'm a little confused about his description of timelines 1 and 2 and their variants.

as i understand it, the j-rods, both p+45 and p+52, and the nordics, are all human descendants of the aftermath of 2012 in timeline 2. they have a vested interest in trying to make sure that we follow timeline 2 because that will justify their history.

it appears that we are increasingly moving toward timeline 1, and a fairly gentle, relatively un-cataclysmic variant at that, based on the letter dan sent to p.c. in april of this year.

if the cataclysmic events of timeline 2 are averted, it would seem that the very existence of the j-rods and nordics would be called into question. it would seem that their history would simply not exist. this seems to suggest that timeline 2 actually will occur, otherwise, how are they even in the picture to be concerned about validating their history?

or do they exist regardless, based on multiple concurrent timelines in alternate universes? but if that's the case, then their history is validated elsewhere and they shouldn't need to be concerned with our timeline.

my brain sometimes gets tied in knots over all of this "back to the future" stuff.

02-10-2008, 05:53 AM	#10
werkeeque Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 577 Senior Member	i've been spending some time listening to the project camelot interviews with dan burisch, and i'm a little confused about his description of timelines 1 and 2 and their variants. as i understand it, the j-rods, both p+45 and p+52, and the nordics, are all human descendants of the aftermath of 2012 in timeline 2. they have a vested interest in trying to make sure that we follow timeline 2 because that will justify their history. it appears that we are increasingly moving toward timeline 1, and a fairly gentle, relatively un-cataclysmic variant at that, based on the letter dan sent to p.c. in april of this year. if the cataclysmic events of timeline 2 are averted, it would seem that the very existence of the j-rods and nordics would be called into question. it would seem that their history would simply not exist. this seems to suggest that timeline 2 actually will occur, otherwise, how are they even in the picture to be concerned about validating their history? or do they exist regardless, based on multiple concurrent timelines in alternate universes? but if that's the case, then their history is validated elsewhere and they shouldn't need to be concerned with our timeline. my brain sometimes gets tied in knots over all of this "back to the future" stuff.
	Quote