DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Enjoymms** · 02-03-2009, 05:08 PM

exactly!
drop the concepts!
stop fighting shadows!

beautifully put brother. i couldn't agree more. i read this today and it seemed relevent to this thread:

session 16 of the law of one january 31, 1981

questioner: i am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the law of one to go from the third to the fourth density. is this correct?

ra: i am ra. it is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. understanding is not of this density.

02-03-2009, 05:08 PM	#10
Enjoymms Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 610 Senior Member	exactly! drop the concepts! stop fighting shadows! beautifully put brother. i couldn't agree more. i read this today and it seemed relevent to this thread: session 16 of the law of one january 31, 1981 questioner: i am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the law of one to go from the third to the fourth density. is this correct? ra: i am ra. it is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. understanding is not of this density.
	Quote