[viagradiscounttt]

it seems to me that this equation describes a relationship between some of the manifestations of energy in the observable universe, ie: matter and electromagnetic energy. (matter is a standing wave manifestation of energy, and nuclear fission is the 'unravelling of the wave, allowing energy to be released, like a knitted sweater can be unravelled to return to a long string)

what is missing from this calculation is the understanding of the 'ether', which is a static field of primal consciousness which contains limitless potential energy, and is the medium through which all vibratory phenomenon propagate. conventional science predicates its equations on the notion of there being no ether, and attempts to describe a universe in which energetic waves need no medium to travel. (empty space)

the ether, or consciousness field, is in fact a very dense ocean of intelligent energy - and dw describes it in this radio interview as a fishtank full of water, wherein the fish swimming are unaware of the water, as the water is ubiquitous, or totally and evenly present - and the absense of the water is something they don't experience. i would add that although there is a high density of water and pressure acting upon the fish, they are built to produce a countering outward pressure which cancels out the water pressure. they have virtually no way of directly experiencing the reality of the water. to them, it appears as a zero field of nothing.

everything in the universe - matter, energy, space and time - are in reality geometric wave formations upon the otherwise still 'water' of the consciousness field. the creative principle causes a 'movement' upon the 'water', thus creating waves, which manifest as all observable phenomena.

i believe that dw is referring to this extra and necessary fact of the consciousness field, which conventional science doesn't factor into the equation. therefore, the equation is only useful insofar as describing relationships between energetic or vibratory manifestations, without addressing their common source. mark