[lerobudrse]

but it is a fairly established self-admitted fact that the feminist movement was engineered and supported by the rockefellers... and to clinch it they bragged about the accomplishment....

...i've come to realize -- like makow -- that we were assuming certain role-playing upon our wives that was essentially against their intelligently designed inner nature, and because these roles were more fitted to men, great damage was done to their feminine spirit -- which of course effected the delicate balance of our man/woman relationships....

the kicker here is that the best laid plans of the negative elite will catalize positive repercussions. women at that time were second class citizens. any group that is repressed or under-represented in a society needs more equality and has the potential to become explosive if its' needs are not met. in this, the negatives saw a way to divide and conquer by agitating and creating havoc.

yes, they were successful to some degree by driving a wedge of separation between men and women. yes, the negative elite love to boast about their power and influence to effect large numbers of people with their tactics.

however, there were also positive outcomes that resulted that i'm sure they never anticipated. for instance, more women in the workforce resulted in better financial equality between the sexes. this enabled more women to escape abusive relationships with their partners.

also, the feminine perspective took on greater influence in the world. thus, some positive aspects such as nurturing, peace, giving of self, etc. which were frowned upon as a weakness before began to be accepted and even embraced by many men.

you see, negative tactics will only achieve negative success on a negative planet. since this is a mixed (+ and -) planet such tactics will have only mixed results. the negative pressure exerted will also have a positive backlash (equal and opposite reaction) as a balance is struck.

in this case, the negative condition of inequality needed to be balanced. women wanted/needed more equality and the negatives saw in this an opportunity to create separation between the sexes and increase their control. what resulted was not what they had hoped for as many men and women now have bridged the gap and the old, strictly patriarchal order has fallen away.

well, goodness...clinton is a no-brainer. obama may still be up in the air... i gather that he is coming along stronger than expected and thus catching many at the top by surprise. incidentally, communists are not necesarily members of the elite illuminati...communism/fascism are merely expedient tools created and utilized by the illuminati. (one needs a program to tell which is which, and the what is where and the when. something like that.)

i agree with most of this although i prefer the term "negative elite" as it is more descriptive of the other side of the coin than a not-so-secret society (of which there are many) which probably also contains members who are not totally enamered with many of its' negative policies. obama could possibly fall into this caveat of being a member, but not fully in alignment with the negative agenda. perhaps he grew up with this negative conditioning and has come to realize that it's not "all that". maybe this negative catalyst he recieved was intended to push him toward polarizing positive? i don't know, it's just a thought...a possibility.