[rxnixoncom]

i've watched the st. clair camelot interview as well. he has some valid and interesting things to say. as well he has a picture of and approach to the "difficulties" we are in that is distinctly his own. just like i do. and you all. and none of us really knows what is going to go down. as well, it is a huge world. what might not work for me in talent, oregon, usa might be totally appropriate to someone in australia, for instance. where the "difficulties" are most intense many of the things he has to say about self-sufficiency may be beyond appropriate - they may be necessities for survival. but a world-wide need for such an approach is likely inappropriate.

that said, and not being one to disqualify anyone's opinions for all time based on any one thing i might disagree with, i found the comment about a montauk type program being at work interesting. not that i believe the government (shadow or obvious) is messing with david, but david works in a field of intense discovery, and some of those who have tread this path in front of him have succumbed to what might seem some incredibly powerful and "negative" sources. negative greeting can be an intense thing, and it is likely not always simply in the form inconveniences within the physical reality, ie: having an important presentation to make with powerpoint, and everything is perfect until you go to release your information to the world, and then everything goes on the fritz. as in the case of edgar cayce, he was "misled" about many things, including an actual pysical pole shift, by a negative service-to-self entity name of... haliel, was it?

so, while i don't think there is a "program" at work, i do, and have, had concerns about how david wilcock identifies and handles negative greeting, and to what extent he challenges every item from any source, even those he is most comfortable with at this time. so to that extent i think st. clair may be saying something that should be heard, just in another form.

as always, let us seek balance and truth, and not by reflex ourselves choose to be "dissing" someone without deeper consideration of their views.

i am very comfortable with david and am highly appreciative of the coherence he seeks to provide about new understandings in physics and the nature of reality, as well as what that all might mean vis a vis 2012. but, it doesn't mean he is an incorruptible source. it doesn't mean his clarity is 100%. i must still apply my own discretion as well. everyone should always apply their discretion to each and every thing put forth, even from our most trusted sources. it is only prudent, and it is advice that comes from on high - trust your inner self. it is just as spot on as david's. as a matter of fact, for you, nothing can be more spot on.