i find d. wilcock to be have a better presentation than m. st. clair, although st. clair is pretty decent in his own right, i am not dissing anyone. from an unbias point of view, i find that st. clair's interviews that are at least 30 mins long, usually 30 mins to 2 hours in length, tend to be lacking in substance of detail regarding some of his theories. he doesn't have a whole lot to present to back up the things he says, ie; evidence. i think wilcock not only presents his material better, he backs it up with plentiful, true, and accurate sources right there whenever he presents, be it radio or video or in person. if you took the time to look up everything david wilcock does list as sources for information in his books, particularly regarding psychological and/or mental things he discusses, you will find out he speaks nothing but the truth 99.9% of the time which makes things downright.. scary! which is why: david wilcock is so unusually polite, nice, and happy whenever recorded for radio or video(internet etc). because deep down inside, whether he likes to admit it or speak about it or not (he doesnt like to speak about it, i read in one of his interviews) i feel even he has a gut instinct (that he doesnt like to talk about as i've seen in his videos) that 2012 is going to go very bad physically. but thats his niche', that spiritually we'll become better or higher beings, despite a (possible/probable) physical death. or we may not die, and just advance into a higher state in the blink of an eye, only time will tell what is going to happen. [moderator note: mr wilcock has said that he believes that no serious physical catastrophies shall occur in regard to earth changes during our 3d sojourn.]