[Vodonaeva]

hello metaman and enkidu

i did not "belittle" ian lungold, on the contrary as i said it was a very "instructive and inspiring" lecture and he seemed to be a very sympathetic, humorous and intelligent person. also i did not say that what happened historically was not accurate and in line with the mayan calendar, i heard carl johan calleman lecture myself in gothenburg...

what i said was that pple who come into this website and forum and are sceptical, like whitestar, can understandably feel sceptical about the predictions of david wilcock also when they watch this video, especially and more so because ian lungold seems so trustworthy. also ian lungold did not bring forth the idea that someone has "the absolute truth" and that everybody must bend to that....that's waht the catholic church did to the mayans actually....

i have not read about the phenomenon "other timelines" in davids blog but i will. to a sceptic that would seem to be a way to "explain away" that nothing happened

this is a forum where you're suppposed to have the right to speak your mind, be critical and true to your own thoughts and feelings, and that's also what ra states you should.

as i've told many times before on the forum i've been brainwashed once with catastrophical cansequences so i'm just being true to myself, not believing anything just because i read it or see it on the internet. all this said doesn't mean i "belittle" divinecosmos and david wilcock.

liliane transiten