DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Creva4k** · 08-29-2008, 04:12 AM

questioner: i am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the law of one to go from the third to the fourth density. is this correct?
ra: i am ra. it is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. understanding is not of this density.

ra material, 16.36

what does this mean? simply that it is not the function of third density to "figure it all out", but rather to learn the ways of love. an intellectual understanding of the creation can neither be complete nor truly achieved.

08-29-2008, 04:12 AM	#4
Creva4k Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 382 Senior Member	questioner: i am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the law of one to go from the third to the fourth density. is this correct? ra: i am ra. it is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. understanding is not of this density. ra material, 16.36 what does this mean? simply that it is not the function of third density to "figure it all out", but rather to learn the ways of love. an intellectual understanding of the creation can neither be complete nor truly achieved.
	Quote