[softy54534]

this is a huge and ongoing issue that both david and wilcock have respectively and repeatedly addressed in various contexts.

both carla and david are, in my mind, top-notch channelers -- especially in their vigilance to remain transparent and consciously uncertain of the final veracity of their own channeled material.

still, in transcripts such as the one you are referring to in which carla has offered information that would negatively qualify the notion of a direct ufo disclosure on earth by (otherwise) positive sto et beings, i find myself needing to hold everything in uncertainty and start from zero, so to speak, in approaching the future.

to the extent that carla's channeled material above reflects reality, and to the degree that quo are really quo and not just carla's own fantasy of the same -- which is entirely possible, regardless of how her own channeling attempts to self-correct in mid-stream by qualifying itself in the way that it (and she) repeatedly, emphatically does -- the play of higher density beings in our realm is clearly a difficult, paradoxical matter, full of confusion in itself, and inherently so, since the modus operandi of beings like quo is, as they say, to not interfere with human free-will, which is itself literally a function, according to the law of one, of being confused!

it's quo's and ra's job, in other words, to tread that fine razor's edge between offering sources of inspiration to those who are receptive to them, while not going so far as to interfere with our own human struggle with that most sacred catalyst towards our remembering who we are -- our primary, in-built, hard-wired confusion -- about who we are, and how events will unfold in the run-up to 2012 and beyond.

what a messy situation this makes for channelers...and their readers!

i had a dream recently in this vein, where i found myself flying among the stars in a light body, like a fish in water, just cruising the galaxy in a state of being quite at home in the vast space of stars. airborn in space thusly, i reflected on my experience on earth in a solid, mortal body, and realized very clearly that as soon as any of us are born, the force of forgetting who we are amounts to that of a lifelong concussion. from this perspective in my dream, i could only appreciate just how difficult an ordeal it is to navigate time and space in such a hotbed of innate, massive, and mas confusion as this poor place truly is.

all by way of saying that, for me, david and carla are each very dear to me -- the closest of friends in a way, for the services they so vigilantly and freely provide. but at the end of the day, it's not up to them how i relate to the future: it's up to me, always. and no matter how many dreams i may have of flying around the stars, when i wake up in the morning, even that vision remains just that -- a vision -- and i'm right back inside this 3-d world with the rough job of being true to my own confusion, and the cognitive uncertainty that goes along with it -- particularly in relation to how 2012 will manifest, including whether or not we will see a benign disclosure of et's and ufo's, etc.

the best thought i can come up with at this point in conclusion is, to echo david's recent poetic riffing on his blog, that god loves surprises, which means that -- no matter how much i meditate and awaken to my own original nature -- when it comes to how our collective future will unfold, it is intrinsically a matter of time playing out and god being surprised -- in each of our forms -- for which the best i can otherwise hope to do is to hold myself well in cognitive uncertainty and otherwise be content to wait and see: cuz i don't know -- and can't know -- what will be before it arrives. and perhaps no one can, in the end. not david, not carla. at best, we are making guesses in the dark -- inspired as we may be by our best intuitions. still, it's all guesswork until the future we are waiting so passionately for finally gets here.

fiz