[connandoilee]

hey gang,

i'm watching these posts coming through with the grumbling and dismay rising to indignation, and i'm disappointed, as i see it's poised to get worse and worse if i don't point out the obvious.

the most prominently displayed reading on my website links right off "start here" button -- the first item below "search," entitled "what is ascension?" this was done for a homosexual client. it did not condemn him or what he was doing -- just the opposite. i put it front and center for several reasons -- and one of them was to take the edge of that oft-misinterpreted law of one quote.

ra did deliver an important truth in the law of one series regarding the fact that homosexual sex simply doesn't have the same aetheric energy quality.

the man releases an unretrievable burst of red-ray energy in orgasm (the woman does not) and the woman's physiology -- both physical and metaphysical -- is built to receive it and transform it into inspiration. there is an aetheric anatomy corresponding to the physical anatomy that enables this, which in turn is the circuitry that can activate the higher chakras.

it is a glaring omission in the law of one series that the topic was not discussed beyond this point. this is a fault of the questioner, a military man who very likely was uncomfortable discussing it, rather than the source. yet for those who are really studying the material, and not just finding one quote and flagging it out of context, the compassion behind the answer is obvious.

my reading has stood in a prominent place for years now to take the charge off. i hope others will remember this in the future if the issue is discussed again:

http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.ph...d=13&itemid=27

- david