[Anydayhybeall]

group,
david's 2012 video was passed to me and was able to view on wife's computer.
the biggest thing about it was david's positive attitude across the wide range of subjects including those often viewed negatively by others.
though many of the new science info was in the early chapters of divine cosmos some things were not. i was struck by the golden ration progression (re time) as we head toward 2012. personally i can see a geometric progression which can be viewed in two ways. as kozrev demonstrates- time is an energy dense at the effect, less dense (slower) at the cause(s). this means there will be two geometric progressions as consciousness increases. 1- more effects and time (clocks) running faster. (they are re: official 'navy' clocks adding seconds to year etc.) 1- a geometric progression of time decreasing, (i.e. moving toward 'out-of-time'/eternity), for those becoming more 'creators'.

however, in the video, (as i understood it), the progression was specific to the golden ratio. i have been through divine cosmos many times and did not see that. does anyone know what the reference was that the progression referred to in the video was "...golden ratio..."? if so exactly what is that based on?

there are some both mathematical and 'mechanical' golden ratio progressions. however, most geometric progressions measured are not. same with spirals, only some are golden ratio.

i am familiar with the golden ratio in many forms, icosahedron, pentagonal, pentagram, etc. that is 'just math'. i can also see the necessity of that ratio being at least some part of any 'reality shift', (such as falling asleep - waking up, etc). the dynamics of those shifts, (of which golden ratio must always be a factor), is in some writing referred to as "rapture repose" ('clarity group'). in that there is a limit of reality shift types, (24), but the ratio is the same. at least so far there is no mention of any sort of geometric progression in that discussion one way or another.

if there is not a specific reference is there some logic or sequence of thinking that led to that conclusion?
michael