DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Saqwnht** · 03-04-2008, 01:45 PM

no. because the word love is so diluted and convoluted.

i mean, to love someone and allow that person to unfold, into who they are. but still love them at the same time.

still love them at the same time.

i believe adding "unconditional" before the word "love" would suit your purpose here foo.

03-04-2008, 01:45 PM	#6
Saqwnht Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 482 Senior Member	no. because the word love is so diluted and convoluted. i mean, to love someone and allow that person to unfold, into who they are. but still love them at the same time. still love them at the same time. i believe adding "unconditional" before the word "love" would suit your purpose here foo.
	Quote