DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**SarkisPioute** · 03-27-2008, 08:35 PM

in an ideal world paul would have been the best, but that is pretty much out now, unless the majority of people write him in, which i doubt will happen.

whatever happens will be the perfect thing, because there are no mistakes in the universe. i am with you though. i just don't think obama is the best for the job, but he is far, far better than bush. and hilary doesn't pull me in either. so we don't have much to choose from (as ususal), and perhaps david got the hit on him, simply because he would be the "least" deceptive, etc. of all of them.

if you haven't seen the clinton chronicles, google video video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6470450895164255089
... you will see why obama is a better choice.

even if ron paul got in, with the power elite running things, i don't think he would last long. i honestly think they would "take him out."

03-27-2008, 08:35 PM	#7
SarkisPioute Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 540 Senior Member	in an ideal world paul would have been the best, but that is pretty much out now, unless the majority of people write him in, which i doubt will happen. whatever happens will be the perfect thing, because there are no mistakes in the universe. i am with you though. i just don't think obama is the best for the job, but he is far, far better than bush. and hilary doesn't pull me in either. so we don't have much to choose from (as ususal), and perhaps david got the hit on him, simply because he would be the "least" deceptive, etc. of all of them. if you haven't seen the clinton chronicles, google video video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6470450895164255089 ... you will see why obama is a better choice. even if ron paul got in, with the power elite running things, i don't think he would last long. i honestly think they would "take him out."
	Quote