[Aceroassert]

little lady say: hello everyone,

just wanted to add here why i take interests in this topic. its not like im on the search for a substance to live forever. i think we should read between the lines here about these ancient beliefs to understand that there was life of some sort of beings here before adam and eve. i think these stories that talk about a substance of 'starseed' that was consumed are fact enough for us to realize that adam and eve were not the first 'beings' here. now mabey adam and eve were the first humans of our kind with souls or something, but i dont think they were the first live 'beings' that were here. mabey the very first beings that descended here had to have a certain substance to maintain life in a physical form, for mabey their natural form was not physical. all in all, i think angles or e.ts, which ever you prefer to call them, roamed here before us. the ones that were not supposed to be here needed a substance to sustain their form here(or something like that). dear lynette, your postings certainly touch on a variety of interesting questions, but the nature of the speculations/questions themselves, along with the way they are posed, suggest that you are not all that familiar with the philosophy that forms the center of and radiates throughout david's website, the divine cosmos.

i don't mean to come off as a wet blanket, but you do need to read the required material -- as agreed upon when you clicked the button for posting in the group, -- that is, one claims to have some minimal pre-knowledge -- through reading -- of the basic material. it seems that if you had done the suggested homework you would not be posing many of the speculations/questions that you have been advancing. for instance, much concerning the essentials of the multi origin of life on earth are spelled out and can be found in the study guide to the ra material -- available on this site, at llresearch.org., and even on the wiki.

i might add that when i stumbled on divine cosmos i stayed glued to the computer for a couple of weeks -- i just about grew roots into the chair, i would try to sleep, but couldn't, and had to get up to explore some more.
one thing i quickly discovered was that this material is not compatible with many of the "givens" of the doctrinal pre-suppostions imprinted on the minds of those exposed early-on to christian ideas -- concepts that permeate the thinking of the western world...and i think i see this christian mind-set guiding much of your approach in dealing with new-age, new-thought.

(things on divine cosmos used to much simpler, and moved at a slower pace. when i joined up there was something like 250 active members...what is it now? six times that number? )

please don't misunderstand me, i do enjoy reading your comments, and i most certainly don't want you to go away. and, yes,i've bent the rules at times

here is #4 in the list that should serve as a helpful guideline to all.


4. we feel that the law of one represents a complete body of spiritual teaching, which becomes increasingly useful the more that it is studied and applied. this group is optimally designed for those who have made a free-will decision to study the teaching and harmonize their own attitudes and behaviors with it, instead of endlessly searching for more “new” teaching to read. be aware that mr. wilcock and his associates receive large volumes of email each day, and when a person “discovers” a new source of channeling they often email us and ask for our opinion. the recommended reading list is a direct result of this broad spectrum of feedback, and the vast majority of “popular” channeling is not included, and thereby considered off-topic. such material is best discussed on other message boards devoted to the study and integration of those particular teachings. the question of one’s personal journey in integrating the law of one teachings is of extreme interest and importance for this group, thus leading to practically limitless areas for personal sharing and participation in a “safe” atmosphere of mutual trust and respect. dear lynette, i trust you will forgive me for bringing this to your attention. its no big deal, just a well-intentioned suggestion. ( i can too easily imagine that you can think of some inspired suggestions to offer me in return )

love, bill gieskieng aka billybobbutterball ... who is noted for making mistakes a way of life.