[WomanBreast40356]

how much should we engage ourselves in changing the system? if the system is perfect for teaching soul to get out of the system - isn't it better to focus energy on helping people wake up to exiting the system instead of changing it or making it better? what do you think? if the question is specifically about changing world structures i agree with you, as they say in the ra material, changing the structure is not the most important thing as love goes freely where it is needed, so the most service can be done in our immediate surroundings, in our daily life with all the people and situations we encounter. but of course it is possible to be of service by changing structures, if somebody wants to change the structure of the system, it depends totally with what intention he/she does this.
there are not so much enlightened politicians around, a lot of them are not doing it from a 4d perspective and how politics is organised is just very tricky and superficial... hence politricks
there is the example of abraham lincoln etc... personally i find it very interesting to think about the current world structure, the assumptions lying behind it, like our free market system, globalisation etc and of course possible alternatives. but i also see a lot of people who think about world structures are actually in a kind of anti-state, they are anti this current structure and will protest against this but do not offer anything essentially new.
for the most important thing is that the current structure does not change anything to our ability to develop oneself and be of service. as ghandi said, be the change you want to see in the world.

for me this also relates to the question of how to be of service.
through actions or through being. both are very usefull and it depends from person to person what tickles the most.
this is also said in the ra material, some people just have an extreme inner peace and through this they help the earth vibration in general without really doing something active, other people are very active in actually doing concrete things and changing the world and doing service to others like that. i think it depends what people are drawn to and that there is no one or correct way. service goes where service is asked and seen.
ra also explained this pretty well in the following example:

session 42:
questioner: i would like to try to make an analogy for third-density of this concept. many entities here feel great compassion for relieving the physical problems of third-density other-selves by administering to them in many ways, with food if there is hunger as there is now in the african nations, by bringing them medicine if they feel that there is a need to minister to them medically, and being selfless in all of these services to a very great extent.

this is creating a vibration that is in harmony with green-ray or fourth-density but it is not balanced with the understanding of fifth-density that these entities are experiencing catalysts and a more balanced administration to their needs would be to provide them with the learning necessary to reach the state of awareness of fourth-density than it would be to minister to their physical needs at this time. is this correct?

ra: i am ra. this is incorrect. to a mind/body/spirit complex which is starving, the appropriate response is the feeding of the body. you may extrapolate from this.

on the other hand, however, you are correct in your assumption that the green ray response is not as refined as that which has been imbued with wisdom. this wisdom enables the entity to appreciate its contributions to the planetary consciousness by the quality of its being without regard to activity or behavior which expects results upon visible planes. greets,
Unknown