View Single Post
Old 10-19-2007, 05:57 AM   #3
Drysnyaty

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
569
Senior Member
Default
the word 'science' in this amusing compendium of failed 'predictions' is conspicuous in its absence.

i recall that, as a child of eight, i conducted my own personal investigation of the spiritual nature of man. the pastor at the church across the street gave me a magazine to read, the 'watchtower', which is a jehovah's witness' publication.

in it, it was claimed that the kingdom of heaven resided in a particular star system, and a pretty and colorful photo was provided of this star system.
it struck me even then that there was no scientific basis for this claim, and on the pretext of hearing my mother call me for lunch, bade haste.

there exists solid, scientific evidence of regular cycles of great energetic change on earth; with drastic evolution of species occurring at node points of these cycles. there exists scientific evidence that the earth/solar system is now entering the time frame of a major node point.

do you know that the remote diagnostic ability of edgar cayce was proven beyond any reasonable doubt? although people can choose to not accept this fact, it is still real. the implications are staggering.

a little more nebulous in regards to scientific provability are his accounts of spiritual reality, for example, and his accounts of the remote past.

a similar situation exists in regards to a vibrational leap of the planet circa 2012. although much hard science circumstantially points to this possibility, no one can know for sure what is going to happen.

but the science that indicates some drastic and sudden change is afoot is undeniable to one who has impartially examined the evidence. see, for example, the work of david hudson and his platinum group monatomic micro-clusters -- when the vibrational speed of the heat-excited atoms in a sample exceed the speed of light, it attains zero mass and disappears from view. again, the implications are staggering!

this is but one example of incontrovertible 'science' that backs up the planetary ascension hypothesis.

in my mind, it remains a hypothesis. and i'm open to any new science that may give me an expanded vision of what may or may not happen and when.

in the meantime, all my scientific enquiry and all my intuitive faculties hold this hypothesis as a valid one, notwithstanding others' expectations of doomsday or the return of jesus.

-mark
Drysnyaty is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity