DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ENCOSEARRALIA** · 09-22-2007, 11:03 PM

for the last three decades, i've been reading a 2,000 page "received" book, called the urantia book. a great number of celestial contributors collaborated for it, carefully utilizing the best thought of human authors (so as not to give us more than we could handle); yet also including striking revelatory material (most pointedly about jesus). the 2,000 pages are woven into an amazingly consistent and unfailingly elevating study. starting from a universe viewpoint, the text opens with discussion of the nature of deity + the structure of the universe, followed by earth history (geographic, religous, cultural, etc.), followed by part iv: the life and teachings of jesus. part iv is a year by year account of jesus' life from birth , which will either strike your inner truth resonator, or it won't. for me, however, the way jesus' life is depicted is spiritually consistent with david's perceptions, which is why i was drawn to divine cosmos.

####

hi.

there are several mentions of the book of urantia in material to found through llresearch.org. from the original ra material the book of urantia is stated to have "not been passed by the planetary council". (although the comparitively difficult to grasp 'ohaspe' work received such an imprimatur --which did surprise me.

following are comments from latwii (one of the factors -- along with the ra -- consitute the principle, q'uo, who is the main agent in post ra material communications )

###

from llresearch....

k: yes, that reminds me of the urantia book. would you comment on the validity of the book?

i am latwii, and am aware of your query, my sister. this book, which your peoples call the urantia book, was compiled by entities existing within the so-called inner planes of your planet. these entities sought to be of service by explaining in their terms, yet using some veiling of explanation, the nature of creation and the nature of evolution upon this planet. these entities sought to be of this service in response to a call of the third-density entities of your planet many, many of your years in your past. as with all answers to those who call, the information offered is stated in such a way as to speak only to those who call. therefore, the information might be seen to be of a limited use, as is any information communicated in this manner, including the information which we have to offer.

may we answer you further, my sister?

k: then i’m assuming this is true of what we call the bible also.

i am latwii, and am aware of your query, my sister. to our knowledge, this is true of any information offered by any source to any who call. for any information is a distortion of that which is attempted in the transmission, that is to say, the nature of truth, the nature of creation, the nature of the creator is as it is. there are those who have traveled the path of seeking who have discovered more and more about truth, shall we say, but to attempt to describe it in what you call words is not to reveal the truth, but to point a direction towards the truth. words are not the experience, therefore, all words are distortion of the experience.

may we answer you further, my sister? ....

snip

my best, bbb

p.s. for those familiar with dr. richard hawkins' work the urantia material got a low rating on his consciousness scale ... but then again i have issues with certain of his ratings which appear totally bizzare to me.

09-22-2007, 11:03 PM	#12
ENCOSEARRALIA Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 502 Senior Member	for the last three decades, i've been reading a 2,000 page "received" book, called the urantia book. a great number of celestial contributors collaborated for it, carefully utilizing the best thought of human authors (so as not to give us more than we could handle); yet also including striking revelatory material (most pointedly about jesus). the 2,000 pages are woven into an amazingly consistent and unfailingly elevating study. starting from a universe viewpoint, the text opens with discussion of the nature of deity + the structure of the universe, followed by earth history (geographic, religous, cultural, etc.), followed by part iv: the life and teachings of jesus. part iv is a year by year account of jesus' life from birth , which will either strike your inner truth resonator, or it won't. for me, however, the way jesus' life is depicted is spiritually consistent with david's perceptions, which is why i was drawn to divine cosmos. #### hi. there are several mentions of the book of urantia in material to found through llresearch.org. from the original ra material the book of urantia is stated to have "not been passed by the planetary council". (although the comparitively difficult to grasp 'ohaspe' work received such an imprimatur --which did surprise me. following are comments from latwii (one of the factors -- along with the ra -- consitute the principle, q'uo, who is the main agent in post ra material communications ) ### from llresearch.... k: yes, that reminds me of the urantia book. would you comment on the validity of the book? i am latwii, and am aware of your query, my sister. this book, which your peoples call the urantia book, was compiled by entities existing within the so-called inner planes of your planet. these entities sought to be of service by explaining in their terms, yet using some veiling of explanation, the nature of creation and the nature of evolution upon this planet. these entities sought to be of this service in response to a call of the third-density entities of your planet many, many of your years in your past. as with all answers to those who call, the information offered is stated in such a way as to speak only to those who call. therefore, the information might be seen to be of a limited use, as is any information communicated in this manner, including the information which we have to offer. may we answer you further, my sister? k: then i’m assuming this is true of what we call the bible also. i am latwii, and am aware of your query, my sister. to our knowledge, this is true of any information offered by any source to any who call. for any information is a distortion of that which is attempted in the transmission, that is to say, the nature of truth, the nature of creation, the nature of the creator is as it is. there are those who have traveled the path of seeking who have discovered more and more about truth, shall we say, but to attempt to describe it in what you call words is not to reveal the truth, but to point a direction towards the truth. words are not the experience, therefore, all words are distortion of the experience. may we answer you further, my sister? .... snip my best, bbb p.s. for those familiar with dr. richard hawkins' work the urantia material got a low rating on his consciousness scale ... but then again i have issues with certain of his ratings which appear totally bizzare to me.
	Quote