[8IhGpvH0]

how is that for a strong fundamentalist reference to make most of the ordinary metaphysical community a little uncomfortable? in conservative fundamentalist christianity we hear so much about, "river of blood" and hell fire and brimstone as punishment if you don't just accept the whole package without question or doubt, never mind how strong your fear or guilt or doubt might really be. yet the known fact that david's own last incarnation, (edgar cayce) started out as highly conservative fundamentalist, sadly enough got in the way of much of what cayce might have been able reveal, at least that is my understanding.

i just recently had what i personally believe is an inner revalation on that subject, and i would appreciate any comments, especially from david. i am not getting this from "da vinci code," my information comes from readings, and friends, pre-dating davinci code by more than 20 years.

i believe that jesus christ married mary magdalene, and i also believe they had more than one child. these children had many descendents, very quickly. a simple differential equation assuming a reasonably low rate of expansion of that blood line including downstream infant mortality and other early death factors, still allows less than 30 or 40 generations for the blood line to spread so thoroughly, that i personally do not believe i could find a human being on earth today who is not directly descended from jesus christ, unless i could find some remote heavily inbred mountain aborigine tribe that never had any interaction with the outside world. possibly a member of such a tribe might not carry the blood of jesus christ in his veins.

i personally believe that one of the major reasons jesus christ came into incarnation was to inject into the race of humans, literally into the physical blood line, a spark of redeeming divinity that would, and does indeed now play an important but subtle role in the ascension in only a few more years.