DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**escolubtessen** · 04-27-2012, 10:43 PM

So you have another postulation other than.. it falls back to us?
You can blame the entire 0.8C rise in temp on CO2 (the IPCC doesn't) if you want.

Because the 0.8C rise represents a sensitivity of 0.33C per 1W/m2 increase in radiative forcing.

That represents the Planck response.

04-27-2012, 10:43 PM	#27
escolubtessen Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 424 Senior Member	So you have another postulation other than.. it falls back to us? You can blame the entire 0.8C rise in temp on CO2 (the IPCC doesn't) if you want. Because the 0.8C rise represents a sensitivity of 0.33C per 1W/m2 increase in radiative forcing. That represents the Planck response.
	Quote