[enactolaelant]

no offense intended, but have you removed the 'beam'?

what is the 'beam'?

jane austen wrote a book titled in what is this 'beam'.

humanly we all have this beam, and seeing through it we don't realize it's presense, until such time as our eye would strain to have sight through what our physical eyes yet maintain as 'real'.

individual freedom of will is paramount, even superceding the greater will which would see through us non-mysteriously having true sight upon all in our stead, for us as the individual for navigational support on our very personal journey, yet impressive of the greater shared kourney as one humanity being.

so, the objective is to remove the subjectivity that is so prevalent in our assumed life-ideation through social conditioning and set cultural behaviors. for the open heart to have this unstrained sight the mind must be opened through one operative turning their vision inward introspectively, to meet nigh unto nigh, in the parity of equal balanced ground.

so it is an issue of rightness of grounding, of what is one rooted within while not knowing of this rootedness. this we place upon the starined eye, listening for that which would in-form us, as if light straining to reach into our unknown shadows; shadows of which are much fear appropriated to by our reluctant fervor to deny and avoid.

so, we have to release ourselves to this true sight, as it is our ill-begotten tendency to deny and run that is the 'strain'.

got to go...