DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**DuePew** · 01-02-2008, 01:43 AM

Is the Real Time Zone truly as its name implies, the "REAL TIME" zone? If I entered it, would I be able to see people in the physical going about their business and later confirm somebody doing something or having a conversation with a friend?

He is asking how the RTZ relates to physicality. Your reply, "Real time" doesnÂ´t exists. Time is only our illusion. Isn't in relation to the question, it is a proclamation about what 'reality' is. It didn't fit into the context of the question, because he wasn't asking what 'real' or 'time' was. There are other threads dedicated to this theme.
do you think, that there is something on this forum, what is not appropriate for philosophical discussions? The point isn't whether philosophical discussions are appropriate- the issue is whether they derail the thread, as in this case.

01-02-2008, 01:43 AM	#6
DuePew Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 634 Senior Member	Is the Real Time Zone truly as its name implies, the "REAL TIME" zone? If I entered it, would I be able to see people in the physical going about their business and later confirm somebody doing something or having a conversation with a friend? He is asking how the RTZ relates to physicality. Your reply, "Real time" doesnÂ´t exists. Time is only our illusion. Isn't in relation to the question, it is a proclamation about what 'reality' is. It didn't fit into the context of the question, because he wasn't asking what 'real' or 'time' was. There are other threads dedicated to this theme. do you think, that there is something on this forum, what is not appropriate for philosophical discussions? The point isn't whether philosophical discussions are appropriate- the issue is whether they derail the thread, as in this case.
	Quote