DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**MexicoCity** · 09-28-2006, 10:42 PM

Well, I'd consider it relative to the akashic records. Here's an example of astral absurdity that I've never been able to get my head round. Maybe someone can guide me in the right direction.

In AD Robert says that we cannot visit a place unless we have a previous memory of it. fair enough - I can see that. So - how on earth can someone visit the inside of a wall and note that it's luminous in there? Not that there is really an 'inside' to wall considering that the wall is made of the same stuff (inside and out). So - concerning the akashic records, are we saying here that because noone has got a pervious memory of it it is imaginary? Does everyone (to rely on PHG's subjective belief) have their own Akashic records?

Well, here's how I would interpret that (not that I really agree with the memory thing, but just how I would look at it

Yes, there are objective areas in the universe as we define objective (they are there whether we consciously believe it or not) but our perception of it would be colored by our memories.
For example, to use the astral locale example: You and I can both go to the same astral locale (or focus of consciousness) and come away with different descriptions of the experience, colored by our own experience memories. Where you see a being of light I might see an unicorn (corny-bleh) and where you see a spider I might see a roach, for example.
The locale is preexisting (if possible) but the experiences rely on our ability to understand or process them, and that is referenced by our memories.
As for the akashic records, for example, I have received information about certain physical disorders that pertain to my life experience (or rather affect it) where you might go to the same 'library' and get information on some other theme, that pertains to your life experience. It's not that we create the AR, but that we contribute and receive from it depending on our own needs.
Now about objectivity, if you get into the metaphysical (which is not what this conversation is really about, if I'm reading this right) if you subscribe to the notion that we are interconnected in a non-local way,and would follow the idea that the universe is a construct created by the whole consciousness in which we are a part of,then objectivity would be relative to the point of view. As in individual vs. collective consciousness (or unconscious, but that's another thread suited for the more philosophically inclined.)
Peace and Love.

09-28-2006, 10:42 PM	#24
MexicoCity Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 566 Senior Member	Well, I'd consider it relative to the akashic records. Here's an example of astral absurdity that I've never been able to get my head round. Maybe someone can guide me in the right direction. In AD Robert says that we cannot visit a place unless we have a previous memory of it. fair enough - I can see that. So - how on earth can someone visit the inside of a wall and note that it's luminous in there? Not that there is really an 'inside' to wall considering that the wall is made of the same stuff (inside and out). So - concerning the akashic records, are we saying here that because noone has got a pervious memory of it it is imaginary? Does everyone (to rely on PHG's subjective belief) have their own Akashic records? Well, here's how I would interpret that (not that I really agree with the memory thing, but just how I would look at it Yes, there are objective areas in the universe as we define objective (they are there whether we consciously believe it or not) but our perception of it would be colored by our memories. For example, to use the astral locale example: You and I can both go to the same astral locale (or focus of consciousness) and come away with different descriptions of the experience, colored by our own experience memories. Where you see a being of light I might see an unicorn (corny-bleh) and where you see a spider I might see a roach, for example. The locale is preexisting (if possible) but the experiences rely on our ability to understand or process them, and that is referenced by our memories. As for the akashic records, for example, I have received information about certain physical disorders that pertain to my life experience (or rather affect it) where you might go to the same 'library' and get information on some other theme, that pertains to your life experience. It's not that we create the AR, but that we contribute and receive from it depending on our own needs. Now about objectivity, if you get into the metaphysical (which is not what this conversation is really about, if I'm reading this right) if you subscribe to the notion that we are interconnected in a non-local way,and would follow the idea that the universe is a construct created by the whole consciousness in which we are a part of,then objectivity would be relative to the point of view. As in individual vs. collective consciousness (or unconscious, but that's another thread suited for the more philosophically inclined.) Peace and Love.
	Quote