[Carol]

No it isn't the only viable explanation. It could easily be a epiphenomena of our conceptual associations. And saying that your example has got anything to do with vibrations is a leap of faith. You have no path of logic from point A to point B.

What you call vibrations in your following paragraph could easily be substituted with something else. Here you appear to simply be using the concept of frequency as an analogy for something else.

And no, I haven't wondered why Robert Bruce goes on about that. I concider astral wildlife to be on the level of egregores, and most likely lacking a will of their own. They're programs following their charter. Saying that egregores which can experience 'higher' emotions aren't astral wildlife seems arbitrary at best.

Electricity doesn't have a vibrational state. You vary a magnetic field rythmically and say that the voltage has a specific frequency, but electrcity is a term used to describe electromagnetic charge.


So thus far my warning signs are justified. It makes it really difficult for me to infer that you know what you're talking about when there are huge gaps in your arguments like the ones I've pointed out. Mind you, I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying you need to analyze your logic and convey it in a reasonable manner.