DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Evelinessa** · 09-20-2006, 08:00 AM

Miramac...

Thank you for your points. I was not aware that Robert Bruce had also recently given a non-residential 5 day seminar for a nominal sum to those who could not afford the 1400 dollar residential seminar. This must be a new thing. If so then it is certainly a step in the right direction. A 5-day luxury seminar for the rich and you use the profits from that to subsidise a 5 day non-residential seminar for the less well of. That is very admirable.

People claim that "frank" treated them disrespectfully. But I reckon that is not the case. He didn't treat me disrespectfully and many, many people speak highly of him. Here I reckon we have 2 or 3 digruntled people, a tiny minority being economic with the truth and using this forum as a sounding board for their own vindictive ends. In doing so they drag us all down. I'm surprised it is allowed. It is certainly againt the opening text in the forum intro and to allow someone to be slagged off in public without giving them leave to respond is just cowardly and something to be ashamed of.

At least frank doesn't associate himself with pedophiles. And for thast he gets my vote.

Novice

EDIT:

I just looked up the details and it wasn't 5 days at all. It was two days and a short lecture on the Friday evening. Plus, Mira, you were sponsoring it, and you now speak highly of it. Talk about "in house". Is there anyone here who is NOT taking a cut of the Robert Bruce pie, LOL (or expecting to at some stage). This place is so biased it's unreal.

09-20-2006, 08:00 AM	#35
Evelinessa Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 490 Senior Member	Miramac... Thank you for your points. I was not aware that Robert Bruce had also recently given a non-residential 5 day seminar for a nominal sum to those who could not afford the 1400 dollar residential seminar. This must be a new thing. If so then it is certainly a step in the right direction. A 5-day luxury seminar for the rich and you use the profits from that to subsidise a 5 day non-residential seminar for the less well of. That is very admirable. People claim that "frank" treated them disrespectfully. But I reckon that is not the case. He didn't treat me disrespectfully and many, many people speak highly of him. Here I reckon we have 2 or 3 digruntled people, a tiny minority being economic with the truth and using this forum as a sounding board for their own vindictive ends. In doing so they drag us all down. I'm surprised it is allowed. It is certainly againt the opening text in the forum intro and to allow someone to be slagged off in public without giving them leave to respond is just cowardly and something to be ashamed of. At least frank doesn't associate himself with pedophiles. And for thast he gets my vote. Novice EDIT: I just looked up the details and it wasn't 5 days at all. It was two days and a short lecture on the Friday evening. Plus, Mira, you were sponsoring it, and you now speak highly of it. Talk about "in house". Is there anyone here who is NOT taking a cut of the Robert Bruce pie, LOL (or expecting to at some stage). This place is so biased it's unreal.
	Quote